Leadership has two main pillars, the material aspect, which is the powers and authorities provided by the organization to the official to carry out his role and manage his work appropriately to achieve the goals set in advance, and the moral aspect, which means his ability to mobilize his team to work with him.

Leadership is the ability to influence others through communication to achieve a specific goal, and there is a big difference between a leader and a manager.

Leadership is the ability to influence others through communication to achieve a specific goal, and there is a big difference between a leader and a manager, although both of them head a work and a group of employees, but the difference between them is very different, and scholars have identified 35 points of difference between a leader-manager and a manager-leader, every leader is a manager, not every manager is a leader, the manager derives his strength from his job, that is, from the official organization he heads, while the leader's qualities are clearly evident through his influence and the strength of his personality.

Leadership is the ability to influence and manage his work appropriately in a way that meets the predetermined goals.

The work cannot be done accurately and orderly by simply issuing orders, but it is necessary to raise the psychological and moral state of employees through a leader who has social acceptance, and the ability to direct them towards work and achievement.

<p class="p1

Leadership is one of the secrets of success, and flexibility in work is one of the secrets of the success of the administrative leader, and of course the behaviors of the manager-leader differ from the manager-leader, the leader advises and is in front of his employees to lead them to achieve goals, while the manager issues orders and is behind his employees to push them, and there is a difference between the two models of management. If the inputs are different, the outputs will be different.

The leader inspires reassurance and hope in the hearts of his employees and collaborators, and creates a state of desire to work and dedication to success, while the manager is always waving sanctions and punishments, and always threatens his employees with punishment, deduction and deprivation of benefits.

The manager is always waving sanctions and punishments, and always threatens his employees with punishment, deduction and deprivation of benefits.

Too much firmness is equal in its results to too much laxity, both are the wrong style of management and cast a bad shadow on the workflow, the firm manager who deals with those around him with harshness and severity turns the work environment into two camps, he is on one side, and his employees on the other, because they consider themselves victims, and their manager is their only adversary. On the other hand, a lax manager turns the work environment into chaos and a single camp - unlike the first group - because they do not feel his presence, do not pay attention to him, and do not value him.

www.dr-hossam.com