In addition, the Committee rejected the amendment proposed by the Committee of Experts to Article 8 to amend the actual period for estimating compensation from 30 days to 60 days and emphasized that the task of the estimation committee in estimating the value of real estate after inspecting it does not require more than 30 days.
The Committee rejected the amendment proposed by the Committee of Experts to Article 8. <The Housing Committee did not want to approve the amendment of the Expert Committee that made the approval of the State Property Authority a condition for the opinion of the competent authority in dispensing with a previously expropriated property in the public interest and amending the provision to make it obligatory for the person whose property has been disposed of by the government to pay the value of the property equal to the same if he wishes to recover it, the Committee believes that this amendment granted greater authority to the State Property Authority to assess whether or not the executive authorities need the expropriated property by restricting the approval of the authority that took the expropriation procedures This restriction exceeds the actual need determined by the law, which in its current formulation requires that the property cannot be allocated to another project of public benefit, and the committee believes that the procedure should be specified in the executive regulations instead of linking the final decision in the matter to the Ministry of Finance, and the requirement to pay an amount equal to the value of the same to recover the property that was expropriated to the state and then determine that it is not needed, is an unfair treatment by equating expropriation with buying and selling.
